Comments on: Primary Colors http://champaigncountydemocrats.org/2007/03/05/primary-colors/ web and blog home of the democratic party of champaign county Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:26:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Free blowjob. http://champaigncountydemocrats.org/2007/03/05/primary-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-6288 Free blowjob. Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:23:37 +0000 http://champaigncountydemocrats.net/2007/03/05/primary-colors/#comment-6288 <strong>Britney spears blowjob....</strong> Latina blowjob. How to give a good blowjob.... Britney spears blowjob….

Latina blowjob. How to give a good blowjob….

]]> By: Brandon Bowersox http://champaigncountydemocrats.org/2007/03/05/primary-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-68 Brandon Bowersox Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:36:07 +0000 http://champaigncountydemocrats.net/2007/03/05/primary-colors/#comment-68 The primary system -- whereby different states hold a primary or caucus on different dates -- seems to work against the "50-state strategy" and undermine the ideal that each voter in each district deserves a chance to interact with the candidates and weigh the issues. Has anyone proposed moving all primaries to one day? Or do people feel that "rolling" elections actually increase voter-candidate contact and involvement by spreading the election activities out over a longer time period? The primary system — whereby different states hold a primary or caucus on different dates — seems to work against the “50-state strategy” and undermine the ideal that each voter in each district deserves a chance to interact with the candidates and weigh the issues.

Has anyone proposed moving all primaries to one day? Or do people feel that “rolling” elections actually increase voter-candidate contact and involvement by spreading the election activities out over a longer time period?

]]> By: Justin Cajindos http://champaigncountydemocrats.org/2007/03/05/primary-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-54 Justin Cajindos Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:17:54 +0000 http://champaigncountydemocrats.net/2007/03/05/primary-colors/#comment-54 That's why some people are puzzled Speaker Madigan is claiming the point of moving up the primary is to help Obama. I suspect that on Feb. 5th whomever wins most of the primaries on that date (it looks like New York and California may hold their primary on Feb. 5th as well) will lock up the nomination, regardless of whether or not Obama wins Illinois. I think the best reason for moving our primary up to Feb. 5th is to give Illinois voters, both Dem and GOP, a chance to vote in a presidential primary before any candidate has the nomination locked up already. If you recall, in 2004 Kerry was already the defacto Dem nominee several weeks before the Illinois Primary in mid March. According to Bill Richardson, however, the race may already be over BEFORE Feb 5th if one candidate sweeps Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. That’s why some people are puzzled Speaker Madigan is claiming the point of moving up the primary is to help Obama. I suspect that on Feb. 5th whomever wins most of the primaries on that date (it looks like New York and California may hold their primary on Feb. 5th as well) will lock up the nomination, regardless of whether or not Obama wins Illinois.

I think the best reason for moving our primary up to Feb. 5th is to give Illinois voters, both Dem and GOP, a chance to vote in a presidential primary before any candidate has the nomination locked up already. If you recall, in 2004 Kerry was already the defacto Dem nominee several weeks before the Illinois Primary in mid March. According to Bill Richardson, however, the race may already be over BEFORE Feb 5th if one candidate sweeps Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina.

]]> By: curious http://champaigncountydemocrats.org/2007/03/05/primary-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-52 curious Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:12:21 +0000 http://champaigncountydemocrats.net/2007/03/05/primary-colors/#comment-52 I don't think anyone will consider an Obama win in Illinois to be of much significance. Sure, Hillary will likely be popular here too, but with this being Obama's home state I suspect he would do really well here. If I'm right, moving up the primary really only stands to hurt him. If he wins, it's no big deal. But if he loses, then it's a story---and not a good one. I don’t think anyone will consider an Obama win in Illinois to be of much significance. Sure, Hillary will likely be popular here too, but with this being Obama’s home state I suspect he would do really well here. If I’m right, moving up the primary really only stands to hurt him. If he wins, it’s no big deal. But if he loses, then it’s a story—and not a good one.

]]>